I had some problems with my W2K server and attempted to do a "repair" from the install CD. At one point in the install, The application had problems reading the CD and I quite (F3) out of the install and tried a different CD drive. I ran into the same problem again. I decided that the problem was with the CD itself. So, I got another one and it had the same problem.
While all this was going on, over several days, and after the first attempt to "repair", I was able to backup the system drive with the backup utility and at another point copied the system drive to another drive. So, I have two copies of the system in different states of disrepair.
As it turned out, or at least I think, the install problem had to do with the fact that I have SCSI and IDE drives on the system. I've recently, within the last year or so, added two IDE drives to the system. I used the "repair" option before and haven't had any problems. This time the install program rearranged my disk configuration. I had a C: system drive and an E: applications drive. The install application changed this configuration by taking my two IDE drives and making the C: and D:, and the installed on the system drive as the E: drive and the applications as the F: drive. This left me with no applications on the system. After much fooling around, I've been able to get the disk configuration back in order and install a new copy of W2K on the system drive under the directory "NewNT". This has allowed me to boot up.
I've copied what I think is the least damaged of the two W2k directories onto the C: drive, but it lacks files, ntoskrnl is one. I've copied over the kernel from the more damaged copy, but I just get into a situation where the boot program keeps finding more and more things it doesn't like' mostly with registry files. I'd like to some how get out of this with as little damage as is possible.
THE PLAN
===========
Here's what I'm thinking about trying.
1) Do a fresh install of w2k into a c:\winnt
2) Install service pack 4 (this is the level I was at before this all began)
3) Restore the most complete copy I've got of the C: drive over the existing C: drive without any replacement of existing files.
I'm hoping this will get me close to the original configuration and that the only mismatch would be the registry files. A clean install will give me the boot files and the boot.ini will allow me to point to a \winnt directory.
Here's a listing of the original configuration the files in the %system%\repair directory
03/31/2008 09:50a <DIR> .
03/31/2008 09:50a <DIR> ..
12/07/1999 04:00a 438 autoexec.nt
04/12/2007 04:22p 2,620 config.nt
03/12/2008 06:06p 217,088 default
03/31/2008 09:50a 0 dir.txt
03/30/2008 09:41a <DIR> RegBack
03/12/2008 06:06p 32,768 sam
03/12/2008 06:06p 77,824 security
03/12/2008 06:04p 154,892 setup.log
03/12/2008 06:06p 35,991,552 software
03/12/2008 06:06p 3,272,704 system
9 File(s) 39,749,886 bytes
Directory of H:\NTRestore\WINNT\repair\RegBack
03/30/2008 09:41a <DIR> .
03/30/2008 09:41a <DIR> ..
03/12/2008 11:49a 217,088 default
03/12/2008 06:58p 5,939,200 NTUSER.DAT
03/12/2008 11:49a 32,768 SAM
03/12/2008 11:49a 77,824 SECURITY
03/12/2008 11:49a 35,479,552 software
03/12/2008 11:49a 7,520,256 system
03/12/2008 07:06p 167,936 UsrClass.dat
Here's a listing of the original configuration files in the system32\config directory
Directory of H:\NTRestore\WINNT\system32\config
03/31/2008 10:17a <DIR> .
03/31/2008 10:17a <DIR> ..
03/12/2008 06:34p 524,072 AppEvent.Evt
03/12/2008 09:50a 221,184 default.sav
03/31/2008 10:17a 0 dir.txt
12/04/2005 08:20a 88 DnsEvent.Evt
03/12/2008 05:08p 32,768 sam.sav
03/12/2008 06:34p 76,632 SecEvent.Evt
03/12/2008 05:17p 90,112 security.sav
03/12/2008 09:50a 35,971,072 software.sav
03/12/2008 06:34p 155,664 SysEvent.Evt
03/12/2008 09:50a 5,660,672 system.sav
My understanding from http://www.computing.net/windows200... is that I can use the recovery console to replace the "new" registry files with the "old" and when I boot again, I'll have the original system back, more or less, except for the NTUser.dat in "Documents and Settings".
PLEASE let me know what yall think of this idea to get things back in order.